COMMONALITIES

Here we have a collection of really interesting facts that might help to give us a better understanding of the whole phenomenon. There are many common factors running through the “abduction” scenario. If we investigate these carefully we might be able to theorise why things happen in the way they are portrayed to us.

1. BEAMS

These shafts or columns of energy have been consistently remembered by “abductees” and are well documented. Energy shafts are mostly described as cylindrical or elliptical, light in colour and are used as the transportation mode for entering a craft that is usually at some height above ground level. The “abductee” is simply floated up and into the craft. So is this some type of antigravity beam?

I remember that Freddy Silva, author of Secrets in the Fields, told me that he had witnessed beams of light, one of which formed a crop circle in the Vale of Pewsey. Such incidents, he said, had been recorded for many decades.

Also Sharon Neill, world renowned Medium, had told me during a reading of my experience that actually there are four beams. The main one breaks up the outer molecules and the others deal with the astral molecular structure.

Whether we are dealing with extra-terrestrials, inter dimensional experiences or whatever, we must take note of common factors such as these. When I had my voluntary experience I was able to get a really good look at one of these shafts. It was about ten meters long, 1 meter wide, a faint yellowy colour and of a cylindrical nature. Two other important factors are that it came down from the “craft” at a sixty degree angle and that it appeared to stop just short of the ground by a few inches. I suffer from vertigo and I am sure that finding myself floating upwards within this shaft (not to mention the incredibility of the situation) probably meant that I lost consciousness at this point. My memory of this energy beam is extremely clear and indelibly fixed in my mind. I would be interested in all other “beam” accounts and also some scientific feedback on this subject.

2. CRAFT

The general appearance of these “vehicles” is of a circular or disc like nature and I have often wondered what better shape could possibly ever exist for a flying vehicle particularly within an atmosphere. There are much larger craft too, very often described as cigar shaped and these probably act as a carrier for the smaller research discs. Is this not where our own technology will end up? This poses another question for me. Is this perhaps us in the unrecorded past or future. The possibility of receiving information concerning the future has been proven to me, therefore it exists and if it exists perhaps that is what I am experiencing.

Time/space is allowing this to happen and it is a mighty step for humans to accept in realities such as the “abduction” scenario. These craft invariably manoeuvre in ways far beyond our current aviation technology and perhaps what is far more important, noiselessly apart from what has been described as a low humming sound. What does this tell us about their power source or if indeed they are not extra- terrestrial then the mode of recognition that “they” employ? Another very well reported factor are the lights that surround these craft are sometimes multi- coloured and very changeable. In other cases these are just bright and intense and as in my second encounter; there are none at all when in close approximation.

Why lights? What could be the relevance of the vast number of different light formations seen in connection with the craft. Is it something that they need i.e. in terms of visual recognition, is it a by-product of the propulsion system or is it in fact for our benefit as opposed to darkness? As the beings depicted by experiencers have eyes, I can only assume that like ourselves, lights are still an important part of the world from which they hail.

3. THE MEDICAL PROCEDURES

Many abductees have related, in their own way, the episode of medical examination and interference that was carried out by the “beings”. Amongst these accounts are a great number of similarities, such as the colour of the room, the operating table, cylindrical objects containing humanoid forms, the instruments used and the physical aspects of the encounter. In particular the removal or planting of eggs and the removal of sperm.

This leads me on to the subject of the theory of a “hybrid” breeding programme.
There is an overall view of abductee thinking that these beings, wherever they come from, are conducting a genetic programme for the purpose of breeding an “alien”/ human hybrid. We have seen the results of these tests which are shown to us on the craft where again, there are many similar descriptions of containers, vats, jars and drawers in which humalien babies are kept, incubator style, surrounded by some sort of liquid or jelly.

These are common factors within the encounter experience and must be regarded with serious consideration. Why are contactees deliberately shown these “incubated beings”? Surely if there was a clandestine programme ongoing it would not be advertised! My own experience of seeing banks of drawer like containers with human/alien forms contained within, is testament to me which enforces my opinion that this is not a one off experience. Our current science is only in the birth stage of genetic engineering yet we have already created a fluorescent mouse using the genes of a jellyfish, Dolly the Sheep, cloned monkeys and a whole host of weird, wonderful and some dangerous genetic life forms. American and Italian researchers are now going to attempt to clone a human being.

My point being, that if the abductors are as advanced as their craft and abduction methods, then their understanding of genetics is likely to be way beyond our comprehension and therefore we can only guess at their motives. There are several theories about this. One being that they are saving our species as we are heading for some sort of annihilation, another being that just as we experiment with monkeys this is just an exploration of life in the universe and that they have been involved in our development for many thousands of years. There may be a flaw in the software of the human brain (hence the sending of prophets), which they are desperate to correct and are currently experimenting on. Of course time may not be as we understand it and therefore we could be living parallel lives or this could be a very futuristic way of contacting either the past or the future. Many abductees have the opinion that the first mentioned is the truest theory.

The light source inside the craft is also interesting in the sense that it rarely changes from one account to another. Nearly all recalls determine a pearl or chalk white appearance with no indication of where the light may eminate from. There are no shadows and the diffusion is uniform. Again, I think that this is where we are heading within our own technology as far as lighting is concerned.

4. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE

Many abductees have been left with physical marks on their bodies, I have personally seen some of these marks and am left in the dark as to what and why they might be. Two commonly reported physical scars or skin marks are, the triangle made up by a series of red dots often found on the chest or abdomen and the other being what are commonly known as “scoop marks”. Then we have the mystery of so called “implants” which are currently being investigated under strict guide lines by the likes of Dr Richard Leir,

I think that as there is little physical evidence to show for this phenomenon, leaving out the obvious i.e. radar recordings, video footage and photos, we should concentrate on the more personal physical evidence which can be recorded and documented. Such aspects of abduction include body markings, pregnancies that simply disappear and implants. These hard facts need to be skilfully and professionally investigated to the highest degree.

Lets start with number one: triangular markings, scoop marks and other marks discovered on bodies. These appear after abduction. They have been shown to doctors who simply have no explanation for them, yet these “scars” have been known to survive for many years. I have seen these marks on “abductees” bodies and they indeed are strange. These marks have been known to disappear for months or years and then inexplicably reappear. I suggest that anyone who has any of these in connection with an encounter should photograph them and report to your doctor so that you have a medical record of them.

Secondly so called false pregnancies. A female abductee will bear all the hallmarks of being pregnant, she will have this confirmed medically, then normally within the first three months, the foetus will somehow have disappeared. Again if this happens to you, obtain all the medical proofs that are possible and make sure they are recorded.

Thirdly, implants. If you suspect that you have one of these in your body why not contact Dr R.Leir as mentioned above. There is little physical evidence considering the amount of contact however, if we were to enquire forensically after an encounter perhaps we would find far more. It is worth looking at Peter Houry’s evidence and remarkable story. Utube.

It is this type of evidence that may finally open a few eyes.

What I find so odd about all these things is that they are so uniform in description regardless of the background, nationality, age, gender, creed or ethnicity of the abductee. Sure there are discrepancies but no more than if you were to ask a quantity of witnesses to say what they saw regarding an accident. To add more credence it is much harder to describe situations that are beyond ones comprehension and that appear to us rather magical. It would be a little like asking a 14th century person to describe a television set showing the news. They would probably describe it as a box with little people in it!!